Email Finder & Enrichment Comparison 2025: 15 Tools, 20,000 Real-World Tests

In this study, we compare the performance of 15 Email Finders on the market to help you make the right choice


try it for free

Why This Market Study on Email Finder Tools?

Sales and Marketing teams struggle with data obsolescence, which is at the core of every strategy today. Companies spend thousands of euros annually to generate leads, aiming to convert them. If an initial attempt fails, it is crucial to retry prospecting at the right moment.

💡 In 2025, between 25% and 33% of your contacts will change companies within the year. These are missed opportunities.

For example, in a database of 50,000 contacts, the best tools on the market can identify nearly 15,000 obsolete and unused contacts, enabling reactivation by Sales teams.

This obsolescence directly undermines the effectiveness of Sales and Marketing teams. While regularly updated data is crucial, vigilance regarding data sources and legality is equally essential.

‍

⚠️ Reminder: Storing and reselling personal data is not GDPR-compliant.

Many companies create personal data databases solely for resale. These may originate from web scraping, purchases on the Dark Web, third-party application data extraction, etc.

‍

‍

Why This Comparison

Choosing the right Email Finder can be the difference between successful outreach and wasted efforts. And at the moment, very few providers communicate transparently about their real performance.

This study was designed to cut through the noise and deliver an unbiased comparison of the best Email Finder solutions worldwide.

Based on a representative dataset of 20,000 contacts, this ranking highlights which tools truly stand out and which fall short when tested in real conditions.

‍

‍

Why Company-to-Domain Matching Matters

Accurate company-to-domain matching is one of the most overlooked yet critical steps in email enrichment. If a tool assigns the wrong domain, every subsequent email guess or verification is built on a wrong foundation.

Surprisingly, many providers fail here, some even returning a high rate of inconsistant domains instead of a company’s actual website, as seen with GetEmail (2,552 emails, representing 22.5% of the emails found, had the wrong domain).

This type of error may go unnoticed, but it directly impacts deliverability, personalization, and ultimately the success of your outreach campaigns.

‍

‍

Keeping Hard Bounce Rates Low

A high hard bounce rate is more than just a technical issue: it’s a direct threat to your email domain reputation. Internet Service Providers monitor bounce rates closely, and too many invalid addresses can trigger spam filters or even blacklisting.

Beyond technical risks, every hard bounce represents a lost opportunity, since those emails will never reach the intended inbox.

The best Email Finder tools minimize this risk by delivering verified, accurate contacts that protect both your sender reputation and your prospecting ROI.

‍

‍

Sending Domain Setup in 2025

Even the best contact data won’t perform if your sending domain setup isn’t properly configured. In 2025, domain authentication protocols like SPF, DKIM, and DMARC are no longer optional—they are fundamental to achieving inbox placement. A strong technical setup ensures your outreach emails actually land where they should: in the inbox. Any evaluation of Email Finder performance must take this into account, as deliverability is the final step that makes data actionable.

👉 To learn everything about setting up your email domain, check out our article: Achieve over 70% open rates thanks to your domain settings

‍

‍

Top 15 Email Finder: Complete Comparison Table

Discover the top 15 email finder tools compared side by side. See features, accuracy, and pricing to choose the best solution for your business.

Rang
Email Finder
Effective Enrichment rate
Overall Error rate
‍
Hard Bounce Rate
Error Domain Rate
Brut Enrichment rate
Performance
🥇 1
🥈 2
🥉 3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Fullenrich*
BetterContact*
54.9%
39.9%
40.9%
31.6%
48.3%
37.2%
32.5%
22.6%
26.1%
37.4%
24.2%
41.3%
48.4%
14.2%
35.5%
1.9%
6.2%
8.1%
6.8%
🔸15.3%
🔸11.2%
🔸16.4%
🔸15.9%
🔸17.8%
❗️23.5%
❗️22.5%
❗️25.4%
❗️27.1%
❗️22.7%
❗️29,7%
0.9%
1.1%
2.3%
1.0%
3.6%
4.7%
❗️11.2%
❗️10.6%
8.3%
❗️10.6%
❗️13.7%
❗️15.8%
4.6%
❗️15.1%
❗️15%
1.0%
5.2%
5.8%
5.8%
❗️11.7%
6.4%
5.3%
5.4%
9.5%
❗️12.8%
8.8%
9.5%
❗️22.5%
7.6%
❗️14.7%
55.9%
42.5%
44.6%
33.9%
57.0%
41.9%
38.9%
26.9%
31.8%
48.9%
31.2%
55.4%
66.3%
18.4%
50.5%
⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
⭐️⭐️⭐️
⭐️⭐️⭐️
⭐️⭐️
⭐️
⭐️
⭐️
 
 
 
 
 
 

Note that the percentage difference between the Hard Bounce Rate and the Error Domain Rate does not equal the Overall Error Rate, since percentages cannot simply be added together. Also: the percentages are calculated directly based on the number of emails found by each solution, and not on the total of 20,000 emails.
‍
This ranking is only valid within the scope of this study; individual observations can be reassessed.
* email waterfall

Curious how Dropcontact ranked in this 2025 study?

See the full Dropcontact results here

Aeroleads – 2025 Email Finder & Enrichment Comparison: Review, Performance & Capabilities

As part of our 2025 Ultimate Email Finder & Enrichment Comparison involving 20,000 real-world tests, we evaluated Aeroleads’ database-powered enrichment for accuracy, data quality, and ROI across various B2B use cases.

Aeroleads General Overview – 2025 Email Finder & Enrichment Tools

Founded in 2015 in India (HQ Bangalore, with a probably registered address in San Jose, USA – 29 employees, according to their LinkedIn profile), Aeroleads positions itself as a 2025 Email Finder & enrichment solution. The platform primarily targets B2B professionals (freelancers, merchants, SMBs, enterprises) but also extends to B2C. Within our Ultimate Email Finder & Enrichment Comparison (20,000 real-world tests), Aeroleads was benchmarked for accuracy and scalability.

Aeroleads Features & Data Sources

  • Single contact search by name, company, industry, seniority, or location
  • Upload & integrations:
    • CSV/Excel file upload
    • Google Chrome extension
    • API
    • 20+ integrations (Zapier, Zoho, Pipedrive, etc.)
  • Database claims: 750M contacts
  • Source:
    • Database compilation method – not disclosed
    • Unknown source – no available information on data provenance
  • GDPR: “compliant” claim, but likely partly from “LinkedIn Leaks”
    ‍
    Given the information we have identified and analyzed concerning the Dropcontact CEO and some twenty other known profiles present in the Aeroleads database, there is a strong likelihood that part of the database originates from "LinkedIn Leaks"

Aeroleads Pricing Model – 2025 Email Finder Subscription Plans

  • Search-based credits
  • Monthly or annual subscription
  • Plans:
    • €42/month for 2,000 searches
    • €127/month for 8,000 searches
    • €256/month for 20,000 searches

Aeroleads Key Risks & Limitations

  • Data obsolescence
  • GDPR compliance: Is there explicit individual consent (from 750 million profiles) for data storage and resale?
  • Potential risk of handling stolen data, subject to legal review

⚠️ A security vulnerability, still present as of September 2025, allows access to the entire database with minimal technical knowledge!

Aeroleads Real-World Performance Results (20,000 Test Benchmark)

‍

Variables
Number
Rate
Email search database (first + last + company name)
20,000
Database (at least one email found by one of the solutions)
17,132
100.0%
Raw emails*
8,650
50.5%
Hard Bounce
1,298
15.0%
Completely inconsistent domains
1,273
14.7%
Loss of usable emails
2,570
29.7%
Actually usable emails
6,080
35.5%
Price per 1,000 usable emails
47.75€

Performance by Region

‍

Location
Based on 20,000 emails
Database (at least one email found by one of the solutions)
Emails actually usable
Rate
USA
9,800
8,395
3,162
37.7%
Europe
9,700
8,309
2,838
34.2%
including France
2,500
2,141
739
34.5%
Worldwide
500
428
168
39.2%
Total
20,000
17,132
6,080
35.5%

Aeroleads Summary – 2025 Email Finder & Enrichment Comparison

Aeroleads positions itself as a well-known email finder and enrichment solution, boasting one of the largest databases with over 750 million profiles. Yet, our 2025 Ultimate Benchmark of Email Finder & Enrichment Tools—based on 20,000 real-life tests—uncovered critical flaws in data quality.

The platform recorded a 15% hard bounce rate, ranking among the worst of the 15 tools tested. In practice, this makes a secondary email verification tool almost unavoidable—driving up costs and eating into overall ROI.

Even more concerning, we identified 14.7% mismatches between company names and email domains. These inconsistencies directly harm deliverability and response rates, as many contacts simply don’t match the real target audience.

The bottom line: Aeroleads’ scale doesn’t make up for its lack of reliability—cost efficiency and campaign performance take a major hit.

Aeroleads Final Assessment – Performance, Accuracy & Cost

  • Actual enrichment rate: 35,5 %‍
  • Hard bounce rate: 15 %‍
  • Inconsistency rate (company vs domain): 14,7 %‍
  • Cost per 1,000 usable emails: 47,75 €


In conclusion, Aeroleads ranks below average in our 2025 Email Finder & Enrichment Benchmark—especially when it comes to accuracy, deliverability, and ROI—compared to the 14 other solutions we analyzed.

Anymail Finder – 2025 Email Finder & Enrichment Benchmark & Test Results

Within our 20,000-test comparative study, AnymailFinder was assessed for deliverability rates, reliability of its proprietary database, and return on investment in modern sales workflows.

‍

Anymail Finder General Overview – 2025 Email Finder & Enrichment Tool

Anymail Finder is a UK-based company founded in 2015 in London. According to its LinkedIn profile, the company operates with a small team of 2–10 employees.  
In our 2025 Ultimate Email Finder & Enrichment Comparison, Anymail Finder was evaluated for scalability, enrichment performance, and overall reliability in B2B lead generation workflows.

Anymail Finder Target Audience & Usage

  • B2B professionals (freelancers, artisans, merchants, SMBs)
  • B2C use cases
  • Search options: individual contact or company search
  • Industry-based search (e.g., Marketing, Finance)
  • Accessibility: Google Chrome extension, contact file upload, API access

These features position Anymail Finder as a versatile email enrichment tool for both business and consumer outreach.

Anymail Finder Pricing Model – 2025 Email Finder Subscription Plans

  • Anymail Finder pricing is based on a pay-per-found-email model, with monthly or annual subscriptions.
  • In our 2025 benchmark, pricing was positioned in the mid-range of competitors:
    • €39/month for 1,000 emails
    • €129/month for 5,000 emails
    • €259/month for 25,000 emails

Anymail Finder Data Enrichment Method & Origin

Anymail Finder relies on an email database, although the total number of contacts available is not disclosed.  
Data origin includes web scraping (LinkedIn, Crunchbase) and third-party services, with unclear data provenance. While the company claims GDPR compliance, transparency around explicit consent and lawful data sourcing remains limited.

Anymail Finder Key Risks & Limitations

  • Data obsolescence
  • Unclear GDPR compliance for storage and resale of personal data
  • Uncertain provenance of data sourced from third-party services

Anymail Finder Real-World Performance Results (20,000 Test Benchmark)

‍

‍

Variables
Number
Rate
Email search database
20,000
Database (at least one email found by one of the solutions)
17,132
100.0%
Raw emails*
9,491
55.4%
Hard Bounce
1,503
15.8%
Completely inconsistent domains
904
9.5%
Loss of usable emails
2,407
25.4%
Actually usable emails
7,084
41.3%
Price per 1,000 usable emails
36.56€

Performance by Region

‍

Location
Based on 20,000 emails
Database (at least one email found by one of the solutions)
Emails actually usable
Rate
USA
9,800
8,395
3,615
43.1%
Europe
9,700
8,309
3,348
40.3%
including France
2,500
2,141
1,018
47.5%
Worldwide
500
428
191
44.7%
Total
20,000
17,132
7,084
41.3%

Anymail Finder Summary -2025 Email Finder & Enrichment Comparison


Anymail Finder initially returned a high volume with 9,491 / 20,000 emails found.
However, a critical quality issue stands out: 25.4% of results were unusable, driven largely by a very high hard bounce rate of 15.8%.
‍
⚠️ A 25.4% unusable rate is well below acceptable standards for enrichment quality, directly harming deliverability and domain reputation. To mitigate this, teams would need to add a third-party email verification step, which increases costs and lowers ROI in large-scale campaigns.

Anymail Finder Final Assessment – Performance, Accuracy & Cost

  • Actual enrichment rate: 41.3%
  • Hard bounce rate: 15.8%
  • Unusable email rate: 25.4% (critically high error rate)
  • Cost per 1,000 usable emails: €36.56

Overall, despite solid initial volume, the 25.4% unusable rate places Anymail Finder among the weakest for data quality in our 2025 Email Finder & Enrichment Comparison.
‍

BetterContact – Smart Email Finder with Waterfall Enrichment: 2025 Performance Review

Our side-by-side benchmark examined BetterContact’s unique waterfall enrichment strategy, powered by internal databases, to see if it outperforms traditional single-source email finders.

BetterContact General Overview – 2025 Email Finder & Enrichment Tool
‍

BetterContact is a French company founded in 2023.  
According to its LinkedIn profile, the company currently operates with a very small team of 4 employees.

‍

Within our 2025 Ultimate Email Finder & Enrichment Comparison (20,000 real-world tests), BetterContact was analyzed for scalability, enrichment quality, and reliability in B2B lead generation workflows.

BetterContact Target Audience & Use Cases

  • B2B (including merchants, artisans, and independent professionals)
  • B2C

BetterContact positions itself as an email enrichment service that can be used for both business and consumer prospecting.

BetterContact Email Finder Accessibility

  • Contact file upload
  • API access
  • Integrations with HubSpot and Google Sheets

These accessibility options make BetterContact usable in common sales and marketing workflows, as benchmarked in our 20,000-test study.

BetterContact Pricing Model – 2025 Email Finder Subscription Plans

BetterContact pricing is based on a pay-per-email-found model, offered only through monthly subscriptions.
‍
In our 2025 benchmark, its pricing was positioned as follows:  

  • $15/month for 200 emails
  • ‍$49/month for 1,000 emails
  • ‍$799/month for 20,000 emails

This places BetterContact in the low-entry, high-scale cost model compared to other email finders.

BetterContact Data Enrichment Method & Sources

BetterContact is based on an email waterfall approach, relying on around 20 third-party enrichment providers.
‍
Because of the origin of these sources, the data comes from a mix of:

  • External email research services
  • Proprietary and purchased databases
  • Undisclosed origins  

However, despite references to transparency from the various email enrichment solutions, the exact origin of the data remains limited.  

BetterContact essentially automates the process and compilation of various email enrichment and validation services, but remains fully dependent on the quality and performance of its subcontractors.

BetterContact Key Concern

  • Data obsolescence risks
  • Reliance on third-party providers, creating dependency
  • ‍Unclear data origins (raising questions on compliance and reliability)  

These concerns directly impact trust in long-term enrichment quality.

BetterContact Real-World Performance Results (20,000 Test Benchmark)

Variables
Number
Rate
Email search database
20,000
Database (at least one email found by one of the solutions)
17,132
100.0%
Raw emails*
7,174
41.9%
Hard Bounce
340
4.7%
Completely inconsistent domains
460
6.4%
Loss of usable emails
800
11.2%
Actually usable emails
6,374
37.2%
Price per 1,000 usable emails
43.56€

Performance by Region

‍

Location
Based on 20,000 emails
Database (at least one email found by one of the solutions)
Emails actually usable
Rate
USA
9,800
8,395
3,255
38.8%
Europe
9,700
8,309
3,016
36.3%
including France
2,500
2,141
860
40.2%
Worldwide
500
428
163
38.0%
Total
20,000
17,132
6,374
37.2%

BetterContact Summary – 2025 Email Finder & Enrichment Comparison

BetterContact operates on a waterfall enrichment model, aggregating results from around 20 third-party providers.

‍
This means that the quality of BetterContact’s output is entirely dependent on the quality of the solutions it integrates. If partner providers have weak or outdated datasets, the overall accuracy of BetterContact will decline accordingly.  

In our 20,000-test benchmark, we observed an 11.2% unusable email rate, broken down into:  

  • 4.7% hard bounces
  • 6.4% domain errors

This highlights both the benefits and the risks of relying on a waterfall model: while coverage is expanded, data consistency and accuracy remain exposed to the weaknesses of its upstream sources.

BetterContact Final Assessment – Performance, Accuracy & Cost

  • Actual enrichment rate: 37.2%
  • Unusable email rate: 11.2%
  • Cost per 1,000 usable emails: €43.56

Overall, BetterContact provides broad enrichment thanks to its waterfall model, but its heavy dependence on partner solutions and an 11.2% unusable rate make its results less reliable compared to the strongest performers in our 2025 Email Finder & Enrichment Comparison.

BetterContact Final Note – Barriers to Entry in 2025

Even if BetterContact remains practical, offering integrations, automation, and accessibility, one key question emerges in 2025:
with the rise of Vibe Coding tools, AI enrichment, and workflow automation solutions like n8n, does BetterContact still have any real barrier to entry?

‍
Its dependency on third-party providers and the lack of proprietary technology may limit its long-term differentiation in an increasingly competitive market.

Datagma – Database-Driven Email Finder: 2025 Accuracy & Enrichment Analysis

In our comprehensive comparison, Datagma’s approach—relying on acquired and compiled external email databases from varied, undisclosed sources—was tested for accuracy, data freshness, and overall performance.

‍

Datagma General Overview – 2025 Email Finder & Enrichment Tool

‍Datagma is a French company founded in 2021.
‍
According to its LinkedIn profile, it currently has a very small team of only 2 employees.‍

Within our 2025 Ultimate Email Finder & Enrichment Comparison (20,000 tests), Datagma was evaluated for accuracy, freshness of data, and return on investment for B2B prospecting.

Datagma Target Audience & Use Cases

  • B2B companies looking for enrichment and lead generation

Datagma positions itself as an enrichment solution focused on professional B2B data discovery.

Datagma Email Finder Accessibility

  • Contact file upload
  • Company or industry-based email search
  • Chrome extension
  • API access
  • Integrations with HubSpot, Make, Zapier, n8n

These features make Datagma accessible across different B2B workflows, but our benchmark showed that performance heavily depends on the underlying data sources.

Datagma Pricing Model – 2025 Email Finder Subscription Plans

Datagma pricing follows a pay-per-email-found model, available in monthly or annual subscriptions.  
In our 2025 benchmark, the pricing tiers were as follows:

  • €49/month for 3,000 emails
  • €95/month for 7,500 emails
  • €239/month for 22,500 emails

This pricing model appears accessible at first glance, but the real ROI depends heavily on the trustworthiness of the underlying data, which comes from undisclosed external sources of uncertain provenance.

Datagma Data Enrichment Method & Sources

Datagma indicates that its service relies on a mix of:

  • Third-party acquired databases‍
  • Compiled external datasets‍
  • “Real-time web crawls” (as claimed by the company)

While Datagma advertises the use of real-time crawling, our analysis suggests that the actual enrichment relies primarily on pre-acquired external databases of undisclosed provenance. This raises serious compliance and reliability concerns, as the sourcing practices remain largely opaque.

Datagma Key Risks & Limitations

  • Heavy reliance on third-party providers, with opaque data origins
  • Limited availability of high-quality public web data‍
  • Risk of outdated or inconsistent records

These factors raise questions about Datagma’s reliability compared to more proprietary solutions.

Datagma Real-World Performance Results (20,000 Test Benchmark)

‍

‍

Variables
Number
Rate
Email search database
20,000
Database (at least one email found by one of the solutions)
17,132
100.0%
Raw emails*
8,378
48.9%
Hard Bounce
888
10.6%
Completely inconsistent domains
1,076
12.8%
Loss of usable emails
1,965
23.5%
Actually usable emails
6,413
37.4%
Price per 1,000 usable emails
9.24€

Performance by Region

‍

Location
Based on 20,000 emails
Database (at least one email found by one of the solutions)
Emails actually usable
Rate
USA
9,800
8,395
3,573
42.6%
Europe
9,700
8,309
2,865
34.5%
including France
2,500
2,141
725
33.8%
Worldwide
500
428
168
39.3%
Total
20,000
17,132
6,413
37.4%

Datagma Summary – 2025 Email Finder & Enrichment Comparison

Datagma’s data origins remain unclear, relying on acquired and compiled external datasets of undisclosed provenance.

‍
In our 20,000-test benchmark, performance was heavily impacted by data quality issues.

‍
A total of 23.5% of emails were unusable, broken down into:  

  • ‍10.6% hard bounces
  • 12.8% domain errors

⚠️ This high unusable rate raises legitimate questions about the reliability and compliance of Datagma’s enrichment process.

Datagma Final Assessment – Performance, Accuracy & Cost

  • Actual enrichment rate: 37.4%‍
  • Unusable email rate: 23.5%
  • Cost per 1,000 usable emails: €9.24

Overall, while Datagma offers results at a low nominal cost, the 23.5% unusable email rate significantly reduces its practical value and raises doubts about its effectiveness in large-scale B2B lead generation.

‍

Dropcontact – Proprietary Email Finder Engine: 2025 Performance Leader

In our 20,000 real-world test benchmark, Dropcontact ranked first overall for both the quantity of valid emails found and the quality of enrichment data.

Its proprietary engine consistently delivered the highest accuracy and freshest results in the entire study.

Dropcontact General Overview – 2025 Email Finder & Enrichment Tool

Dropcontact is a French company founded in 2019 in Paris.  
According to its LinkedIn profile, the company operates with a team of around 15 employees.


Within our 2025 Ultimate Email Finder & Enrichment Comparison, Dropcontact was analyzed for enrichment performance, scalability, and accuracy.

Dropcontact Target Audience & Use Cases

  • B2B professionals and companies seeking accurate and up-to-date enrichment data

Dropcontact focuses exclusively on B2B enrichment, positioning itself as a solution for Sales teams, Marketing operations, and automation workflows.

Dropcontact Email Finder Accessibility

  • Individual contact or company search
  • Contact file upload
  • API access
  • Google Sheets add-on
  • MCP access
  • Native integrations include HubSpot, Pipedrive, n8n, Make, Zapier, and more

👉 These powerful and high-performing integrations make Dropcontact directly usable within existing CRM and marketing workflows.

Dropcontact Pricing Model – 2025 Email Finder Subscription Plans

‍Dropcontact pricing follows a pay-per-email-found model, available with monthly or annual subscriptions.  
In our benchmark, the plans are:  

  • €29/month for 500 emails
  • €79/month for 4,000 emails
  • €199/month for 11,000 emails
  • €399/month for 20,000 emails

All pricing tiers include Dropcontact’s highly performant email validation system, with the exclusive ability to validate or invalidate catch-all domain addresses.  

An additional option is available to automatically process and update changes in company information (such as job moves, new company domains, or role changes), ensuring that enriched data remains fresh and up to date.  

This positions Dropcontact as a solution balancing scalability, cost-effectiveness, and advanced data reliability.

Dropcontact Data Enrichment Method & Sources

Unlike most competitors, Dropcontact has developed proprietary algorithms to generate and verify contact data in real time.

‍
Its system is based on:  

  • ‍Proprietary enrichment algorithms
  • Internal verification mechanisms

This approach ensures that enrichment quality and freshness are not dependent on third-party providers.

Dropcontact Key Concerns

  • Some professional sectors are excluded from Dropcontact’s search: Dropcontact does not find the emails of retailers and craftsmen.

Dropcontact Real-World Performance Results (20,000 Test Benchmark)

‍

Variables
Number
Rate
Email search database
20,000
Database (at least one email found by one of the solutions)
17,132
100.0%
Raw emails*
9,584
55.9%
Hard Bounce
87
0.9%
Completely inconsistent domains
95
1.0%
Loss of usable emails
182
1.9%
Actually usable emails
9,402
54.9%
Price per 1,000 usable emails
20.00€

Performance by Region

‍

Location
Based on 20,000 emails
Database (at least one email found by one of the solutions)
Emails actually usable
Rate
USA
9,800
8,395
4,429
52.8%
Europe
9,700
8,309
4,737
57.0%
including France
2,500
2,141
1,214
56.7%
Worldwide
500
428
81
18.8%
Total
20,000
17,132
9,402
54.9%

Dropcontact Summary – 2025 Email Finder & Enrichment Comparison

Dropcontact is an Email Finder powered by proprietary algorithmic technology, designed to deliver accurate and up-to-date professional contact data.

‍
In our 20,000-test benchmark, Dropcontact consistently ranked among the most reliable solutions.  

While some bounces were observed in earlier versions of the tool, even after double verification, the solution has since been improved and reinforced to further minimize this risk.  

Unlike database-based solutions, Dropcontact’s real-time enrichment approach prevents the issue of data obsolescence and ensures information remains fresh.  

‍
This model also provides a key compliance advantage: it is fully aligned with GDPR regulations, which apply to individuals living in Europe and prohibit the resale of stored personal data without the explicit consent of the individual concerned.

By not depending on external providers or static datasets, Dropcontact distinguishes itself from 99% of solutions on the market, offering a unique approach to email enrichment.

Dropcontact Final Assessment – Performance, Accuracy & Cost Assessment

  • Actual enrichment rate: 54.9%
  • Cost per 1,000 usable emails: €20.00
  • Strength: Proprietary algorithmic enrichment with advanced validation
  • Differentiator: Exclusive ability to validate catch-all domains and update company changes  

Overall, Dropcontact achieved the highest balance of accuracy, freshness, and cost-efficiency in our 2025 Email Finder & Enrichment Comparison, confirming its position as the performance leader of the study.

Enrow – Lightweight Email Finder Performance in the 2025 Comparative Study

We evaluated Enrow’s minimalistic enrichment approach as part of our 2025 Ultimate Email Finder & Enrichment Comparison to determine whether its streamlined design delivers consistent accuracy and value in real-world scenarios.

Enrow General Overview – 2025 Email Finder & Enrichment Tool

Enrow is a French company founded in 2023.
 
According to its LinkedIn profile, it currently operates with a very small team of 3 employees.
‍
Within our 20,000-test benchmark, Enrow was analyzed for accuracy, scalability, and cost-effectiveness.

Enrow Target Audience & Use Cases

  • B2B professionals and companies

Enrow presents itself as a lightweight solution primarily designed for B2B use cases.

Enrow Email Finder Accessibility

  • Individual contact or company search
  • Contact file upload
  • API access
  • Integration with Zapier

These accessibility options allow Enrow to be connected to automation workflows and integrated into sales or marketing operations.

Enrow Pricing Model – 2025 Email Finder Subscription Plans

Enrow pricing is based on a pay-per-email-found model, with monthly or annual subscription plans.  
The tiers are:  

  • $29/month for 2,000 emails‍
  • $49/month for 5,000 emails
  • $199/month for 30,000 emails

Enrow Key Concerns

  • Significant domain error rate (5.8%), leading to misdirected emails and reduced campaign effectiveness
  • ‍Hard bounces (2.3%)**, contributing to a total error rate of 8.1%‍
  • Unclear GDPR compliance, as we identified during the study a number of emails that appear to originate from pre-existing databases.  While this use seems limited in scope, it raises legitimate questions about transparency and regulatory compliance.

Enrow Real-World Performance Results (20,000 Test Benchmark)

‍

‍

Variables
Number
Rate
Email search database
20,000
Database (at least one email found by one of the solutions)
17,132
100.0%
Raw emails*
7,636
44.6%
Hard Bounce
176
2.3%
Completely inconsistent domains
446
5.8%
Loss of usable emails
662
8.1%
Actually usable emails
7,014
40.9%
Price per 1,000 usable emails
8.72€

Performance by Region

‍

Location
Based on 20,000 emails
Database (at least one email found by one of the solutions)
Emails actually usable
Rate
USA
9,800
8,395
3,542
42.2%
Europe
9,700
8,309
3,337
40.2%
including France
2,500
2,141
908
42.4%
Worldwide
500
428
188
44.0%
Total
20,000
17,132
7,014
40.9%

Enrow Summary – 2025 Email Finder & Enrichment Performance

Enrow is positioned as an affordable Email Finder with a streamlined design.  
In our benchmark, it showed a total error rate of 8.1%, including 5.8% domain errors (emails reaching the wrong recipients) and 2.3% hard bounces.

‍
During testing, we also identified some emails that appear to originate from pre-existing databases. While seemingly limited in scope, this raises legitimate questions about transparency and GDPR compliance.

Enrow Final Assessment – Accuracy, Error Rates & Cost (2025)

  • Actual enrichment rate: 40.9%
  • Domain error rate: 5.8%
  • Hard bounce rate: 2.3%
  • Total error rate: 8.1%
  • Cost per 1,000 usable emails: €8.72

FindThatLead – Single-Database Email Finder: 2025 Benchmark

Part of our Ultimate 2025 Email Finder Comparison, FindThatLead’s single-source database was tested for accuracy, compliance, and adaptability in B2B outreach.

FindThatLead General Overview

FindThatLead is a Spanish company founded in 2014 in Barcelona.  
According to their LinkedIn profile, they have 18 employees.

FindThatLead Target Audience & Use Cases

  • B2B

FindThatLead Email Finder Accessibility

  • Contact file upload‍
  • Single email search‍
  • Chrome extension‍
  • Integration with Zapier

FindThatLead Pricing Model (2025)

  • Pay-per-email-found model
  • ‍Monthly or annual subscription‍
  • Plans:
    • €49/month for 2,000 emails
    • €99/month for unlimited emails

FindThatLead Data Enrichment Method

FindThatLead combines web scraping, simple pattern-based algorithms, and stored databases to find emails and enrich prospect data.

FindThatLead Data Sources

  • Public web scraping
  • Stored database

FindThatLead Key Risks & Limitations

  • Exceptionally high error rates, with 7.6% domain errors and 15.1% hard bounces, leading to a total of 22.7% invalid emails
  • Lowest effective enrichment rate of the entire study, at only 14.1% out of 20,000 tested searches
  • ‍Severe reliability limitations, as this error level positions FindThatLead as the weakest performer in the 2025 Email Finder benchmark
  • Data obsolescence: Scraped web data may not be up-to-date
  • GDPR compliance: Data is stored in a database, raising potential concerns.

FindThatLead Results – 2025 Email Finder Benchmark

‍

‍

Variables
Number
Rate
Email search database
20,000
Database (at least one email found by one of the solutions)
17,132
100.0%
Raw emails*
3,152
18.4%
Hard Bounce
476
15.1%
Completely inconsistent domains
238
7.6%
Loss of usable emails
714
22.7%
Actually usable emails
2,438
14.2%
Price per 1,000 usable emails
39.43€

Performance by Region

‍

Location
Based on 20,000 emails
Database (at least one email found by one of the solutions)
Emails actually usable
Rate
USA
9,800
8,395
1,265
15.1%
Europe
9,700
8,309
1,131
13.6%
including France
2,500
2,141
363
16.9%
Worldwide
500
428
85
19.9%
Total
20,000
17,132
2,438
14.2%

FindThatLead Summary – 2025 Email Finder & Enrichment Benchmark

FindThatLead offers an attractive pricing model, especially with its unlimited plan at €99/month.  
However, in our 20,000-contact benchmark, the results were among the weakest of all tested tools.  

Only 18.4% of emails were initially found, and after validation, just 14.2% proved usable.
The high domain error rate (7.6%) and hard bounce rate (15.1%) combine into a total error rate of 22.7%, the highest of the entire study.
This positions FindThatLead as the least reliable solution in the 2025 comparison.

FindThatLead Final Assessment – Performance, Accuracy & Cost

  • Actual enrichment rate: 14.2% (lowest in the study)
  • Domain error rate: 7.6%
  • Hard bounce rate: 15.1%
  • Total error rate: 22.7%
  • Cost per 1,000 usable emails: €39.43

Findymail -Friendly Email Finder: 2025 Performance & Limitations

In our 20,000 real-world tests, we examined Findymail’s enrichment capabilities for accuracy, transparency, and scalability in lead generation workflows.

Findymail General Overview

Findymail is a French company founded in 2022.  
According to their LinkedIn profile, they currently have 9 employees.

Findymail Target Audience & Use Cases

  • B2B professionals and companies

Findymail is positioned as a developer-friendly solution, often integrated into automation workflows and lead generation pipelines.

Findymail Email Finder Accessibility

  • Single contact search
  • Contact file upload
  • API access
  • Integrations with Zapier & Make
  • Dedicated Google Sheets add-on
  • Google Chrome extension

Findymail Pricing Model (2025)

  • Findymail pricing follows a pay-per-email-found model with monthly or annual subscriptions.
  • The tiers are:‍
    • $49/month for 1,000 emails
    • $99/month for 5,000 emails
    • $249/month for 15,000 emails

Findymail Data Enrichment Method

Findymail does not disclose precise details about its enrichment process, making it unclear whether the platform relies on proprietary methods or external sources.

‍
This lack of transparency makes it difficult to evaluate how results are generated and how data freshness is ensured.

Findymail Data Sources

  • Undisclosed or unclear sources (possible reliance on databases, algorithms, or third-party providers)

Findymail Key Risks & Limitations

  • Opaque enrichment process, with no clear information on whether data is generated, stored, or purchased
  • Risk of data obsolescence, if external or static datasets are used
  • Unclear GDPR compliance, as it is impossible to determine whether explicit consent exists for stored personal data

Findymail Results – 2025 Email Finder Benchmark

‍

Variables
Number
Rate
Email search database
20,000
Database (at least one email found by one of the solutions)
17,132
100.0%
Raw emails*
7,285
42.5%
Hard Bounce
78
1.1%
Completely inconsistent domains
376
5.2%
Loss of usable emails
454
6.2%
Actually usable emails
6,831
39.9%
Price per 1,000 usable emails
17.20€

Performance by Region

‍

Location
Based on 20,000 emails
Database (at least one email found by one of the solutions)
Emails actually usable
Rate
USA
9,800
8,395
3,531
42.1%
Europe
9,700
8,309
3,215
38.7%
including France
2,500
2,141
820
38.3%
Worldwide
500
428
163
38.0%
Total
20,000
17,132
6,831
39.9%

Findymail Summary – 2025 Email Finder & Enrichment Comparison

Findymail provides a variety of tools for email lookup and integrations that are useful for lead generation workflows.
‍
However, in our 20,000-contact benchmark, only 6,831 emails were usable, resulting in an actual enrichment rate of 39.9%.

Performance was further limited by an error rate of 6.2% (including both domain errors and hard bounces).  
In addition, data sourcing methods are not disclosed, making it difficult to fully assess reliability, freshness, and GDPR compliance.

Findymail Final Assessment – Accuracy & Cost

  • Actual enrichment rate: 39.9%
  • Total error rate: 6.2%
  • Cost per 1,000 usable emails: €17.20

FullEnrich – Multi-Source Email Enrichment Cascade: 2025 Reliability Review

FullEnrich claims to leverage a cascade of over twenty different data sources for enrichment. In our 20,000 real-world test benchmark, we evaluated its accuracy, consistency, and overall performance against 14 competitors.

FullEnrich General Overview

FullEnrich is a French company founded in 2024.
‍
According to their LinkedIn profile, they have 15 employees.

FullEnrich Target Audience & Use Cases

  • B2B professionals and companies

FullEnrich markets itself as a scalable enrichment solution for sales and marketing operations.

FullEnrich Email Finder Accessibility

  • Contact file upload
  • API access
  • Integrations with Zapier, Make, n8n and Clay

FullEnrich Pricing Model (2025)

  • Pay-per-email-found model
  • Available with monthly, annual, or one-time payment plans
  • Pricing tiers:
    • €29/month for 500 emails
    • €55/month for 1,000 emails
    • €1,150/month for 25,000 emails

FullEnrich Data Enrichment Method

FullEnrich operates through an email waterfall system, sequentially querying +20 partner providers until a result is found.  
These partners include solutions such as Datagma, Wiza, Hunter, PeopleDataLabs, Clearbit, and others.

‍

Like BetterContact, FullEnrich does not generate its own enrichment but rather connects to multiple third-party sources.
Its results are therefore entirely dependent on the quality and continuity of these external providers.

FullEnrich Data Sources

  • Partner Email Finders, which themselves rely on:
    • Stored databases
    • LinkedIn scraping
    • Algorithms
    • Pattern-based search

FullEnrich Key Risks & Limitations

  • Strong dependency on 20 third-party providers, with performance automatically dropping if a partner service is removed
  • ‍No proprietary enrichment engine, as FullEnrich only connects existing providers rather than generating data itself
  • ‍GDPR compliance risks, since FullEnrich cannot guarantee that all 20 providers in its waterfall are truly compliant.
    It only takes one non-compliant provide (despite claims to the contrary) for the entire waterfall process to lose GDPR compliance for European targets. ⚠️

FullEnrich Results – 2025 Email Finder Benchmark

‍

Variables
Number
Rate
Email search database
20,000
Database (at least one email found by one of the solutions)
17,132
100.0%
Raw emails*
9,765
57.0%
Hard Bounce
349
3.6%
Completely inconsistent domains
1,146
11.7%
Loss of usable emails
1,495
15.3%
Actually usable emails
8,270
48.3%
Price per 1,000 usable emails
58.89€

Performance by Region

‍

Location
Based on 20,000 emails
Database (at least one email found by one of the solutions)
Emails actually usable
Rate
USA
9,800
8,395
4,028
48.0%
Europe
9,700
8,309
4,018
48.4%
including France
2,500
2,141
1,033
48.3%
Worldwide
500
428
219
51.1%
Total
20,000
17,132
8,270
48.3%

FullEnrich Summary – 2025 Email Finder & Enrichment Benchmark

FullEnrich is a well-designed product, even receiving recognition on Product Hunt for its interface and positioning.  
In our 20,000-contact benchmark, however, the loss of usable emails remained significant at 15.3%, highlighting issues with accuracy and reliability.

‍

The email waterfall model introduces additional risks, since FullEnrich depends on the practices of its 20 partner providers.  
If even one of these providers is not fully GDPR compliant, the entire waterfall process may lose compliance for European targets.  
Some of the partner sources also appear to rely on public databases or less reliable methods, further affecting data quality.

‍

Finally, while FullEnrich aggregates multiple providers into a single interface, the concept itself raises questions:  
with the rise of vibe coding tools, automation platforms like n8n, and AI orchestration, does FullEnrich really maintain a strong barrier to entry in 2025?

FullEnrich Final Assessment – Performance & Cost

  • Actual enrichment rate: 48.3%
  • Loss of usable emails: 15.3%
  • Cost per 1,000 usable emails: €58.89
    • This is the most expensive solution in the 15-tool benchmark,
    • 23% more costly than the second most expensive provider.
  • However, FullEnrich also delivers phone numbers in addition to emails — a feature only shared with BetterContact among the compared solutions.

GetEmail – Database-Powered Email Finder: 2025 Strengths & Weaknesses

We analyzed GetEmail’s database-driven enrichment engine to assess performance, coverage, and accuracy across different global markets.

GetEmail General Overview

GetEmail is a French company founded in 2016.
According to their LinkedIn profile, they have 20 employees.

GetEmail Target Audience & Use Cases

  • B2B professionals and companies

GetEmail Email Finder Accessibility

  • Contact file upload
  • API access
  • Integrations with Make, Zapier, etc.

GetEmail Pricing Model (2025)

  • Pay-per-email-found model
  • Monthly subscription only
  • Pricing tiers:
    • $49/month for 300 emails
    • $99/month for 1,000 emails
    • $149/month for 2,000 emails
    • $399/month for 10,000 emails

GetEmail Data Enrichment Method

GetEmail relies on real-time web scraping and pattern deduction.

The tool scans millions of websites to detect email formats (e.g., firstname@company.com) and then generates potential addresses for all employees at a given company.

This means that many results are not retrieved from an actual database but rather deduced, which can significantly affect accuracy.

GetEmail Data Sources

  • Real-time web crawling
  • Pattern-based deduction

GetEmail Key Risks & Limitations

  • No email verification process, meaning that generated addresses may not actually exist
  • ‍High risk of inaccuracies, since many emails are inferred rather than confirmed
  • ‍Limited reliability, as scraping public sources does not guarantee freshness or completeness of data

GetEmail Results – 2025 Email Finder Benchmark

Variables
Number
Rate
Email search database
20,000
Database (at least one email found by one of the solutions)
17,132
100.0%
Raw emails*
11,363
66.3%
Hard Bounce
525
4.6%
Completely inconsistent domains
2,552
22.5%
Loss of usable emails
3,077
27.1%
Actually usable emails
8,286
48.4%
Price per 1,000 usable emails
26.48€

Performance by Region

‍

Location
Based on 20,000 emails
Database (at least one email found by one of the solutions)
Emails actually usable
Rate
USA
9,800
8,395
3,917
46.7%
Europe
9,700
8,309
4,042
48.6%
including France
2,500
2,141
1,083
50.6%
Worldwide
500
428
373
87.0%
Total
20 000
17,132
8,286
48.4%

GetEmail Summary – 2025 Email Finder & Enrichment Benchmark

GetEmail delivered a relatively strong raw enrichment rate of 48.4% in our benchmark, which initially positions it above several other solutions.
 
However, it also recorded the highest number of unusable emails across the entire study, with 3,077 incorrect addresses (27.1%).

This very high error level generates a direct financial overcost, since an external verification layer is almost mandatory to clean results before use. In addition, the hard bounce rate can progressively damage domain deliverability, reducing the chances of reaching inboxes over time.
‍
Finally, because a significant number of generated addresses do not match the intended targets, cold email campaigns risk producing poor engagement and disappointing results.

GetEmail Final Assessment – Accuracy & Cost

  • Actual enrichment rate: 48.4%
  • Unusable emails: 3,077 (27.1%)
  • Cost per 1,000 usable emails: €26.48

GetProspect – Database-Powered Email Finder: 2025 Comparative Performance

Within our Ultimate Email Finder & Enrichment Benchmark, we evaluated GetProspect’s accuracy, pricing, and data sourcing strategies to assess its readiness for sales operations.

GetProspect General Overview

GetProspect is a Ukrainian company founded in 2016.
According to their LinkedIn profile, they have 6 employees.

GetProspect Target Audience & Use Cases

  • B2B professionals and companies

GetProspect Email Finder Accessibility

  • Contact file upload
  • Single contact/company search
  • Google Chrome extension
  • API access
  • Integrations with Make, Zapier, Google Sheets, etc.

GetProspect Pricing Model (2025)

  • Pay-per-email-found model
  • Available via monthly or annual subscription
  • Pricing tiers:
    • $49/month for 1,000 emails
    • $99/month for 5,000 emails
    • $199/month for 20,000 emails
    • $399/month for 50,000 emails

GetProspect Data Enrichment Method

GetProspect operates a large nominative database containing:

  • ‍230 million professional emails
  • 26 million international companies
  • 130 million phone numbers

GetProspect Data Sources

  • Internal databases
  • Real-time web crawling (claimed)

GetProspect Key Risks & Limitations

  • ‍Potential data obsolescence, as static records may become outdated quickly
  • ‍Transparency concerns, with limited clarity on how its datasets are continuously updated or verified
  • GDPR compliance risks, since nominative data storage and resale are not clearly linked to user consent

GetProspect Results – 2025 Email Finder Benchmark

‍

Variables
Number
Rate
Email search database
20,000
Database (at least one email found by one of the solutions)
17,132
100.0%
Raw emails*
5,440
31.8%
Hard Bounce
451
8.3%
Completely inconsistent domains
519
9.5%
Loss of usable emails
970
17.8%
Actually usable emails
4,470
26.1%
Price per 1,000 usable emails
11.73€

Performance by Region

‍

Location
Based on 20,000 emails
Database (at least one email found by one of the solutions)
Emails actually usable
Rate
USA
9,800
8,395
2,600
31.0%
Europe
9,700
8,309
1,922
23.1%
including France
2,500
2,141
498
23.2%
Worldwide
500
428
147
34.4%
Total
20,000
17,132
4,470
26.1%

GetProspect Summary – 2025 Email Finder & Enrichment Benchmark

‍‍

GetProspect delivered a relatively low enrichment rate in our benchmark compared to other solutions.  
Out of the 20,000 tested searches, only 26.1% of emails were usable, reflecting one of the weakest scores in the study.  

Additionally, 17.8% of results were unusable due to a mix of hard bounces and invalid domains, which undermines reliability.

This level of error not only reduces efficiency but also creates a risk of increased costs (through the need for additional verification) and weaker performance in cold outreach campaigns.

GetProspect Final Assessment – Accuracy & Cost

  • Actual enrichment rate: 26.1%
  • Unusable emails: 17.8% (hard bounces + invalid domains)
  • Cost per 1,000 usable emails: €11.73

Hunter.io – Scraping-Based Email Finder: 2025 Accuracy, Compliance & ROI

Hunter.io’s web scraping technology, combined with its structured datasets, was tested for deliverability, compliance, and cost-effectiveness across multiple geographies.

Hunter.io General Overview

Hunter.io was founded in 2015 by two French entrepreneurs, and is often considered one of the pioneers of the Email Finder industry.  
The company’s headquarters are now located in Delaware, USA.
According to their LinkedIn profile, they currently have 33 employees.

Hunter.io Target Audience & Use Cases

  • B2B professionals and companies

Hunter.io Email Finder Accessibility

  • Single search (contact name or company search)
  • CSV or Excel contact file upload
  • API access
  • Google Sheets add-on
  • Integrations with 20+ solutions (Zapier, Make, Pipedrive, Clay, etc.)

Hunter.io Pricing Model (2025)

  • Pay-per-email-found model
  • Monthly or annual subscription
  • Pricing tiers:
    • €49/month for 1 000 emails
    • €149/month for 10,000 emails
    • €299/month for 25,000 emails

Hunter.io Data Enrichment Method

Hunter.io claims to operate a database of 117 million professional emails, continuously fed by scraping 90 million web pages per day.  
It also uses email pattern deduction (e.g., firstname.lastname@company.com) to generate new contacts.

Hunter.io Data Sources

  • Public web data
  • Large-scale web scraping
  • Email domain pattern deduction

Hunter.io Key Risks & Limitations

  • Data obsolescence risks, since scraped emails and domains may quickly become outdated
  • ‍High dependency on scraping, which may reduce accuracy in industries with fewer publicly exposed emails
  • ‍GDPR compliance concerns, as it is unclear whether 117 million individuals ever gave explicit consent for their personal data to be stored and resold

Hunter.io Results – 2025 Email Finder Benchmark

‍

‍

Variables
Number
Rate
Email search database
20,000
Database (at least one email found by one of the solutions)
17,132
100.0%
Raw emails*
6,665
38.9%
Hard Bounce
744
11.2%
Completely inconsistent domains
351
5.3%
Loss of usable emails
1.095
16.4%
Actually usable emails
5,570
32.5%
Price per 1,000 usable emails
35.73€

Performance by Region

‍

Location
Based on 20,000 emails
Database (at least one email found by one of the solutions)
Emails actually usable
Rate
USA
9,800
8,395
3,129
37.3%
Europe
9,700
8,309
2,487
29.9%
including France
2,500
2,141
642
30.0%
Worldwide
500
428
125
29.1%
Total
20,000
17,132
5,570
32.5%

Hunter.io Summary – 2025 Email Finder & Enrichment Benchmark

Hunter.io is one of the pioneers in the Email Finder industry, operating with a large database of 117+ million professional emails.
‍
It is also one of the very few solutions in this benchmark to openly acknowledge its reliance on large-scale web scraping, whereas many competitors use similar practices without explicitly stating it.  

In our benchmark, however, data quality issues emerged:‍

  • ‍11.2% hard bounces
  • 5.3% invalid domains

This led to a total of 5,570 usable emails out of 20,000 tested, limiting its reliability for sustained outreach.

Note: With the mass adoption of AI-driven scraping, it remains uncertain whether Hunter.io’s current approach will still be as reliable in the coming months or years.

‍
That said, as a long-time pioneer in email enrichment with years of experience and domain expertise, Hunter.io is likely to continue refining its methods and adapting its strategy to stay competitive in the AI era.

Hunter.io Final Assessment – Accuracy & Cost

  • Actual enrichment rate: 32.5%
  • Hard bounce rate: 11.2%
  • Domain error rate: 5.3%
  • Total error rate: 16.4%
  • Cost per 1,000 usable emails: €35.73

‍

Icypeas – Email Enrichment Service: 2025 Viability Test

We tested Icypeas’ enrichment approach to see whether its results align with or fall short of the accuracy levels observed in other solutions from our 2025 Ultimate Email Finder & Enrichment Comparison.

Icypeas General Overview

Icypeas is a French company founded in 2022.
According to their LinkedIn profile, they have 4 employees.

Icypeas Target Audience & Use Cases

  • B2B
  • B2C with support for consumer domains such as @hotmail.com and @gmail.com

Icypeas Email Finder Accessibility

  • Single search (contact or company)
  • Contact file upload
  • API access
  • Google Sheets add-on
  • Chrome extension
  • Integrations with Zapier and Make

Icypeas Pricing Model (2025)

  • Pay-per-email-found model
  • Monthly or annual subscription
  • Pricing tiers:
    • €15/month for 1,000 emails
    • €30/month for 4,000 emails
    • €60/month for 10,000 emails
    • €250/month for 100,000 emails

Icypeas Data Enrichment Method

Unlike many competitors, Icypeas does not rely on pre-stored databases.  
Instead, the platform works in real time by pinging open sources such as:  

  • Public web pages
  • SMTP servers
  • DNS servers  

This method is designed to generate fresh results, but its effectiveness depends heavily on the availability and accuracy of these open signals.

Icypeas Data Sources

  • Web pages and public online content
  • SMTP servers
  • DNS servers

Icypeas Key Risks & Limitations

  • Data obsolescence
  • Variable accuracy: While real-time pings to web pages, SMTP, and DNS servers can provide fresh results, this method often produces inconsistent accuracy. Without a stored dataset to cross-check, there is a higher risk of false positives or unusable emails.
  • ‍Lack of verification depth: The absence of historical or proprietary reference databases limits Icypeas’ ability to validate results over time, making its reliability highly dependent on the quality of open-source signals available at the moment of the request.
  • Opaque filtering logic: Icypeas does not disclose how it filters out invalid or temporary addresses, leaving users uncertain about the true deliverability of the provided emails.

Icypeas Results – 2025 Email Finder Benchmark

‍

‍

‍

Variables
Number
Rate
Email search database
20,000
Database (at least one email found by one of the solutions)
17,132
100.0%
Raw emails*
5,808
33.9%
Hard Bounce
59
1.0%
Completely inconsistent domains
336
5.8%
Loss of usable emails
395
6.8%
Actually usable emails
5,413
31.6%
Price per 1,000 usable emails
8.13€

Performance by Region

‍

Location
Based on 20,000 emails
Database (at least one email found by one of the solutions)
Emails actually usable
Rate
USA
9,800
8,395
2,885
34.4%
Europe
9,700
8,309
2,488
29.9%
including France
2,500
2,141
649
30.3%
Worldwide
500
428
152
35.5%
Total
20,000
17,132
5,413
31.6%

Icypeas Summary – 2025 Email Finder & Enrichment Benchmark

Icypeas positions itself as an affordable Email Finder, delivering a usable enrichment rate of 31.6% in our benchmark.
‍
Its real-time ping approach (web pages, SMTP, DNS) ensures data that is fresh and directly queried from open sources, but this method can lead to variability in coverage and consistency compared to database-driven competitors.  

Overall, the results confirm that while emails provided are generally valid, the lower enrichment rate limits the volume of usable contacts for large-scale outreach campaigns.

Icypeas Final Assessment – Accuracy & Cost

  • Actual enrichment rate: 31.6%
  • Cost per 1,000 usable emails: €8.13

LeadMagic – Email Enrichment Solution: 2025 Performance Breakdown

LeadMagic was analyzed to assess its position in accuracy, coverage, and compliance within our 2025 Ultimate Email Finder & Enrichment Comparison.

LeadMagic General Overview

LeadMagic is an American company founded in 2022.  
According to their LinkedIn profile, they have 9 employees.

LeadMagic Target Audience & Use cases

  • B2B professionals and companies

LeadMagic Email Finder Accessibility

  • Single contact search
  • Contact file upload
  • API access
  • Integrations with Zapier, Clay, and Salesforce

LeadMagic Pricing Model (2025)

  • Pay-per-email-found model
  • Available via monthly subscription
  • Pricing tiers:
    • $99/month for 10,000 emails
    • $259,99/month for 30,000 emails

LeadMagic Data Enrichment Method

LeadMagic relies on a proprietary database, which is continuously enriched by combining multiple external and user-provided inputs.
‍
This allows the platform to maintain a large nominative dataset that supports its email finder capabilities, but also raises questions about freshness and compliance.

LeadMagic Data Sources

  • Licensed data from third-party providers
  • Publicly available information
  • User-contributed data collected during platform usage
  • Information gathered from public websites and directories
  • Business registries and public records
  • Social media platforms and professional networks

LeadMagic Key Risks & Limitations

  • Transparency issues, with limited visibility into how third-party licensed data is sourced‍
  • Data obsolescence, as static or purchased records may quickly lose accuracy
  • ‍Potential resale of customer data, since user-contributed information is added to the shared dataset‍
  • GDPR compliance concerns, because nominative data storage requires explicit consent from individuals

LeadMagic Results – 2025 Email Finder Benchmark

‍

‍

Variables
Number
Rate
Email search database
20,000
Database (at least one email found by one of the solutions)
17,132
100.0%
Raw emails*
4,616
26.9%
Hard Bounce
489
10.6%
Completely inconsistent domains
247
5.4%
Loss of usable emails
736
15.9%
Actually usable emails
3,880
22.6%
Price per 1,000 usable emails
10.51€

Performance by Region

‍

Location
Based on 20,000 emails
Database (at least one email found by one of the solutions)
Emails actually usable
Rate
USA
9,800
8,395
2,267
27.0%
Europe
9,700
8,309
1,661
20.0%
including France
2,500
2,141
424
19.8%
Worldwide
500
428
132
30.9%
Total
20,000
17,132
3,880
22.6%

LeadMagic Summary – 2025 Email Finder & Enrichment Benchmark

LeadMagic showed an actual enrichment rate of 21.4% across 20,000 tested contacts.  
Additionally, 4.2% of the collected emails were unusable, primarily due to hard bounces and invalid domains.

This error level generates a financial overcost, as a secondary verification process becomes highly recommended to secure campaign results.  
It may also affect domain deliverability over time, while reducing the effectiveness of cold outreach campaigns if messages are sent to invalid or misattributed contacts.

‍

LeadMagic Final Assessment – Accuracy & Cost

  • Actual enrichment rate: 22.6%
  • Unusable emails: 15.9% (hard bounces + invalid domains)
  • Cost per 1,000 usable emails: €10.51

VoilaNorbert – Database-Based Email Finder: 2025 Reliability & Speed Review

We assessed VoilaNorbert’s simplicity and speed in our 20,000-test benchmark to determine its reliability for large-scale outreach campaigns.

‍

VoilaNorbert General Overview

VoilaNorbert was originally created in 2015 by two French entrepreneurs before being acquired by a U.S.-based company in Texas.
‍
According to their LinkedIn profile, they have 12 employees.

VoilaNorbert Target Audience & Use Cases

  • B2B professionals and companies

VoilaNorbert Email Finder Accessibility

  • Single contact search
  • Contact file upload
  • API access
  • Google Sheets add-on
  • Chrome extension
  • Integrations with Zapier, Pipedrive, HubSpot, etc.

VoilaNorbert Pricing Model (2025)

  • Pay-per-email-found model
  • Monthly or annual subscription
  • Pricing tiers:
    • $49/month for 1,000 emails
    • $99/month for 5,000 emails
    • $249/month for 15,000 emails
    • $499/month for 50,000 emails

VoilaNorbert Data Enrichment Method

VoilaNorbert provides emails through its proprietary internal database, primarily populated by:  

  • ‍Customer-imported data** when using the platform
  • ‍Data collected from “other organizations” (origin not specified)

VoilaNorbert Data Sources

  • User-imported data into Norbert
  • Stored data within VoilaNorbert’s proprietary database

VoilaNorbert Key Risks & Limitations

  • Potential resale of customer data, as user-imported information may be added to the shared database
  • Data obsolescence, since stored records can quickly become outdated without live verification
  • GDPR compliance concerns, as nominative data storage requires explicit user consent

VoilaNorbert Results – 2025 Email Finder Benchmark

‍

Variables
Number
Rate
Email search database
20,000
Database (at least one email found by one of the solutions)
17,132
100.0%
Raw emails*
5,341
31.2%
Hard Bounce
734
13.7%
Completely inconsistent domains
469
8.8%
Loss of usable emails
1,203
22.5%
Actually usable emails
4,138
24.2%
Price per 1,000 usable emails
20.88€

Performance by Region

‍

Location
Based on 20,000 emails
Database (at least one email found by one of the solutions)
Emails actually usable
Rate
USA
9,800
8,395
2,219
26.4%
Europe
9,700
8,309
1,892
22.8%
including France
2,500
2,141
540
25.2%
Worldwide
500
428
122
28.4%
Total
20,000
17,132
4,138
24.2%

VoilaNorbert Summary – 2025 Email Finder & Enrichment Benchmark

VoilaNorbert showed an actual enrichment rate of 24.2% in our 20,000-test benchmark.  
Among the results, 22.5% of the collected emails were unusable, mainly due to hard bounces and invalid domains.  

This level of error can directly impact the effectiveness of cold outreach campaigns, as bounced or misattributed contacts reduce both deliverability and response potential.

VoilaNorbert Final Assessment – Accuracy & Cost

  • Actual enrichment rate: 24.2%
  • Unusable emails: 22.5% (hard bounces + invalid domains)
  • Cost per 1,000 usable emails: €20.88